Gear Review

ThermoBall™ Traction Mules – warm slip-ons that actually grip

These are the “cold morning, tent-to-brew, hut-to-porch” kind of mules: insulated, cosy, and built with a proper rubber outsole so you’re not skating across wet flags.

Reviewed with a focus on real use cases: campsite shuffles, post-walk recovery, and winter errands .

At a glance

Headline verdict

In one line: Properly warm, properly grippy camp mules that feel more “shoe” than “slipper”.

Best for: Cold mornings at camp, hut life, post-walk downtime, dog/van/garden duties in damp winter weather.

Not ideal for: Anyone who wants a featherweight packable hut slipper.

Bottom line: If you want insulated mules that can handle wet patios and quick trips outside, these are a strong buy.

Check price on Amazon

Full review

How the ThermoBall™ V Traction Mules perform in real use

What these mules are (and aren’t)

Think of these as insulated “camp shoes” rather than bedroom slippers. The big difference is the outsole: you get a proper rubber base designed for traction, not a thin foam sole that’s fine indoors but sketchy the moment you step onto wet stone or frosty decking.

They’re made for quick trips outside, slow shuffles around camp, and keeping your feet warm when your hiking boots come off. They’re not a replacement for waterproof boots, and they’re not built for long, rough hikes — but that’s not the point.

Warmth & comfort

The ThermoBall™ insulation is designed to keep warmth even in damp conditions, and the fleece collar lining adds that “ahhh” factor when you finally get your feet out of stiff boots. For UK winter use, they’re aimed squarely at cold mornings and chilly evenings — especially if you’re on cold ground (van, cabin floor, bothy, tent porch).

If you run very cold, pair them with thicker socks and you’ll get the most from them. If you run warm, they can feel like overkill indoors — but outside, that warmth is exactly what you’re paying for.

Grip & outdoor practicality

This is where the V Traction version earns its keep. The outsole is made with up to 20% recycled rubber and is intended for grip on wet and dry surfaces — ideal for damp flagstones, muddy grass, snowy steps, and the classic “just popping out to…” moments.

The upper is a recycled ripstop with a non-PFC durable water-repellent finish, so it’ll shrug off light moisture, drizzle and surface snow. It’s not seam-sealed, so sustained wet conditions will soak through eventually — but for quick use outside, it’s the right level of protection.

Fit, on/off ease & heel design

The collapsible heel and elastic side panels make them easy to slide on and off — useful when your hands are cold or you’re half-asleep making a brew. The brand rates them true to size, which is what you want from a mule: predictable fit, with enough room for socks.

Tip: if you’re between sizes and want a dedicated “thick sock” camp shoe, sizing up can make sense. If you want a closer fit for barefoot use indoors, stick with your usual size.

Durability & materials

Ripstop is a smart choice for camp footwear — it resists scuffs and snagging better than softer textiles. The recycled P.E.T. upper and recycled insulation are also a nice win if you’re trying to nudge your kit in a lower-impact direction, without sacrificing function.

As with all slip-ons, the main wear points are usually the outsole tread and the heel structure (from lots of stepping on the back). If you treat them as camp shoes rather than daily street trainers, they should hold up well.

Weight & packability

At roughly 462 g per pair, they’re not the lightest “spare footwear” you could pack. But they also feel more secure and capable than ultralight hut slippers. For backpacking, they’re a luxury item; for car camping, van trips, cabins and winter travel, the weight is a non-issue and the comfort payoff is big.

Value & alternatives

At around £65 RRP, they sit in that sweet spot where you get meaningful insulation and a real outsole, without paying “premium expedition bootie” money. The obvious alternatives are:

  • Cheaper slipper-mules: often fine indoors, but usually lack traction and wet-surface confidence.
  • Down booties: warmer for sleeping, but less durable and often worse outside.
  • Winter mules/booties with heavier soles: better for daily street use, but bulkier and less pack-friendly.

If your main need is “warm feet + safe steps outside”, the ThermoBall™ V Traction Mules make a strong case.

Summary

Pros, cons & who it’s for

What I liked

  • Warmth that makes sense outdoors (insulation + fleece collar feel genuinely cosy)
  • Traction-focused rubber outsolefor wet patios, frosty paths and campsite ground
  • Easy on/off with collapsible heel and elastic side panels

What I didn’t

  • Not fully waterproof (great for light moisture, not for prolonged wet)
  • Mule shape = less ankle warmth than full booties in deep cold